Legal Opinion

Campbell v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 15, 2011No. 09-16370PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Two thousand unlicensed junior accountants brought this wage-and-hour class action against their employer, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC). Among other things, the accountants claim PwC failed to pay them mandatory overtime under California law. The district court granted partial summary judgment to the accountants, finding as a matter of law that PwC could not exempt them from California’s overtime requirements. PwC filed this interlocutory appeal.

We must decide whether unlicensed accountants in California are categorically ineligible, as a matter of law, to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Muhammed Abdullah v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Avilez v. Pinkerton Government ServicesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. Bradshaw v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  4. Boyd v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  5. United States v. NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API