Moeller-Prokosch v. Prokosch
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal is the third arising from a superior court's initial custody order conditioning custody upon the relocation of a parent. We decided in the first appeal that the superior court cannot place restrictions on a parent's ability to relocate, but rather must make a custody determination in light of each parent's situation, taking into consideration all factors related to the best interests of the child.. We concluded in the second appeal that the superior court erred on remand in failing to make a custody determination based on an assumption that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barrett v. AlguireAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- McQuade v. McQuadeAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Fardig v. FardigAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Craig v. McBrideAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Moeller-Prokosch v. ProkoschAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Silvan v. AlcinaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Veselsky v. VeselskyAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Rego v. RegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Williams v. BarbeeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Blanton v. YourkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.