Anhalt v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Bremer District Court. — Hons. J. F. Clyde and C. H. Kelley, Judges. Aotion by abutting property owner to recover damages from an interurban railway company occasioned to his property by the use of the street by said company for purposes other than that of a street railway. Plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
Plaintiff in his petition states: That he is the owner of the south half of lots 5 and 6 in block 19 in Cretzmeyer’s addition to Waverly, and occupies the same as a residence. That the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, for the purpose of, and has been for a number of years last past engaged in operating an interurban railway in the counties of Bremer and Black Hawk in this state. That, as such, it maintains freight and passenger depots in Waverly, and has other stations along its lines, for the reception of freight and the accommodation of passengers. That, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Milburn v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Harvey v. Aurora & Geneva Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Slatten v. Des Moines Valley R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Diebold v. Kentucky Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Wisner v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weimer v. LueckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- City of Des Moines v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Webb v. Omaha & Southern Interurban Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Illinois Central Railway Co. v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Interurban Railway Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922