Legal Opinion

Roe v. Kornder-Owen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1997No. 96-698PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

The appellant, Betty Roe, filed a claim for damages based on the alleged negligence of the defendant, Colleen Komder-Owen, in the District Court for the Eighth Judicial District in Cascade County. Komder-Owen filed a motion for summary judgment and, after a hearing, the District Court granted that motion. Roe appeals the order granting summary judgment. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of Colleen Komder-Owen.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On September 16,1991, the vehicles being operated by Betty…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ryan v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. DeVerniero v. EbyMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Sprunk v. First Bank SystemMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wiley v. City of GlendiveMontana Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Spinler v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Contreras v. FitzgeraldMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Daniel Fabich v. PPL MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Fabich v. Ppl MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Tonner v. CirianMontana Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API