Mendez v. Southwest Community Health Services
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the trial court found that plaintiff was totally disabled, but only awarded compensation benefits for a scheduled injury. Plaintiff appeals, contending that she should have been awarded benefits for total disability. Defendant cross-appeals, contending that: (1) there was insufficient evidence of causation; (2) the trial court did not mean to find that plaintiff was totally disabled; (3) there was insufficient evidence of total disability; and (4) there was insufficient evidence that plaintiff’s scheduled injury was fully…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Ledbetter v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Sanchez v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Golden Cone Concepts, Inc. v. Villa Linda Mall, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Ballard v. Book Heating & Cooling, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sanchez v. Zanio's Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Valdez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.