Legal Opinion

Mendez v. Southwest Community Health Services

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1986No. 8532PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the trial court found that plaintiff was totally disabled, but only awarded compensation benefits for a scheduled injury. Plaintiff appeals, contending that she should have been awarded benefits for total disability. Defendant cross-appeals, contending that: (1) there was insufficient evidence of causation; (2) the trial court did not mean to find that plaintiff was totally disabled; (3) there was insufficient evidence of total disability; and (4) there was insufficient evidence that plaintiff’s scheduled injury was fully…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ledbetter v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Sanchez v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Golden Cone Concepts, Inc. v. Villa Linda Mall, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Ballard v. Book Heating & Cooling, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Sanchez v. Zanio's Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Valdez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API