Doe v. Mortham
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
708 So.2d 929 (1998)
John DOE, et al., Appellants,
v.
Sandra MORTHAM, etc., Appellee.
No. 88677.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 19, 1998.
Philip G. Butler, Jr., of Butler & Brown, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellants.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and George Waas, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
SHAW, Justice.
We have on appeal an order of the trial court declaring several Florida statutes facially constitutional. The district court certified that the order involves issues of great public importance requiring immediate resolution by this Court.[1] We have…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Osterberg v. PecaTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Florida Dept. of Children and Fam. v. FlSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Larry Darnell Perry v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada v. HellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.