Legal Opinion

American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Eidelberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClare J. Hoyt, J.

Defendant Eidelberg moves to dismiss the complaint for the foreclosure of a mortgage on the grounds of insufficiency in law.

The plaintiffs allege that on November 2, 1964 defendant Surrey mortgaged certain premises to plaintiff, American Savings and Loan Association, to secure the sum of $450,000, that thereafter a participating interest in said mortgage was assigned to plaintiff Jackson Heights Savings and Loan Association, that said premises are incumbered by a mortgage in the amount of $59,800 given by defendant Surrey to defendant Eidelberg’s testator which mortgage was subordinated to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Hanover Bank v. Roslyn Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Mintz v. KupfersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. ALASKA TITLE GUARANTY COMPANYAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Cambridge Factors, Inc. v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Riley v. South Somers Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Alden Hotel Co. v. KaninNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United States v. Joe Murray's Point Lookout, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API