Legal Opinion

Satterfield v. Mathews

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1979No. Civ. A. B-76-C-8PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EISELE, Chief Judge.

The Motion for Summary Judgment by the defendant is now before the Court in this Social Security Disability case. Whether the final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, adverse to the plaintiff, is supported by substantial evidence is the question to be resolved in this review.

Jurisdiction in a case of this nature is extremely limited. The Court is not authorized to try the case de novo, or to consider additional evidence, or to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative fact finders on questions of fact. If the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Charles M. Laws v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carder v. HemstockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  2. DeFrancisco v. Arkansas Kraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Torres v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. J. v. Satterfield v. Joseph Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Rowland v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API