BASF Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge.
Defendant seeks leave of Court to show confidential documents to a third-party consultant in accordance with the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order granted by this Court on November 6, 2003, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of this Court. For the reasons discussed below, this Court denies Defendant’s motion.
BackgRound
This motion involves a discovery dispute in a case challenging the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) denial of BASF’s protest of the classification of seven entries, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1514(a)(2). The imported merchandise is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guy O. Dove, Iii, Spargos Mining Nl v. Atlantic Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Reliance Insurance v. Barron'sDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Culligan v. Yamaha Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Advocate Health Care NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Sioux Pharm, Inc. and Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Eagle Laboratories, Inc. Bio-Kinetics Corporation And Dana SummersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Streck, Inc. v. Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2008
- Nellson Northern Operating, Inc. v. Elan Nutrition, LLCDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2006
- Flores v. StanfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.