Legal Opinion

Hatton v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 2011No. A11A0413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Presiding Judge.

Acting on her own behalf, Shirley Hatton sued Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) in 2007, alleging she was injured while boarding a MARTA train in 2001. This was the third action Hatton had filed against MARTA based on the incident. MARTA moved to dismiss this action contending, among other things, that it was barred by the statute of limitation. Hatton countered that she was entitled to file a renewal action following her voluntary dismissal of the first action (which had been filed within the two-year limitation period), and that the third action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Belcher v. FolsomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Mateen v. DicusSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Worley v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Bailey v. McNealyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Cooper-Bridges v. IngleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burroughs v. Georgia Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. State v. Sara WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  3. Zina Burroughs v. Georgia Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API