Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Jones

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided November 1, 1977No. CGCM 9948; Docket No. 804Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRosenwasser, Chief Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part);

I concur only in approving the finding of guilty of AWOL. I disagree with Judge Bridgman’s opinion that the search aboard the GLACIER was lawful.

As the opinion acknowledges, the contraband 1 found in Ambrose Jones’ locker was discovered in the course of a “search” as distinguished from an “inspection”. As the government conceded on oral argument, no probable cause to search Jones’ locker existed.

The view of the majority is that the search was reasonable, and therefor lawful, irrespective of probable cause. Today’s holding, then, is that a shakedown…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. GebhartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. DrewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API