Legal Opinion

Town of McMinnville v. Stroud

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM WARREN. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Warren County. M. D. Smallman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

*570This was argued at the bar as a suit by the town of McMinnville against the defendants, for the violation of a corporation ordinance; but upon opening and reading the record, we find that the warrant makes no mention of a corporation ordinance, but requires the defendants to answer the town of McMinnville for the violation of one of the criminal statutes of the State — the one commonly known under the designation of the “Pour Mile Law.” Of course no town or city can maintain such a suit. Crimes under the public statutes of the State must be punished by indictment or presentment, as provided…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deitch v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of Nashville v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API