Town of McMinnville v. Stroud
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM WARREN. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Warren County. M. D. Smallman, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
*570This was argued at the bar as a suit by the town of McMinnville against the defendants, for the violation of a corporation ordinance; but upon opening and reading the record, we find that the warrant makes no mention of a corporation ordinance, but requires the defendants to answer the town of McMinnville for the violation of one of the criminal statutes of the State — the one commonly known under the designation of the “Pour Mile Law.” Of course no town or city can maintain such a suit. Crimes under the public statutes of the State must be punished by indictment or presentment, as provided…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deitch v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- Southern Railway Co. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- City of Nashville v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1934