Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ernst v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1939No. 27429. En BancPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court by which relators seek the issuance of a permanent writ of prohibition restraining respondent from further proceedings in four actions brought against them.

The Prudential Insurance Company of America, the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, the Aetna Life Insurance Company, and the New England Mutual Life Insurance Company, each instituted an action in the superior court of Thurston county during the year 1938, under the provisions of the uniform declaratory judgment act of this state, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), §§ 784-1 to 784-17 [P. C. §§…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Meyer v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Mackintosh v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Griffith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State ex rel. Peterson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Brien v. Police CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Mulhausen v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State ex rel. New York Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Skagit County Public Hospital District No. 304 v. Skagit County Public Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API