Hadix v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs appeal the district court’s calculation of attorney fees under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (codified in scattered sections of the U.S.Code). We must decide whether attorney fees under the PLRA should be computed according to the hourly rate authorized by the Judicial Conference for the payment of court-appointed counsel or on the rate that historically has actually been paid to appointed counsel in PLRA cases. For the reasons that follow, we shall REVERSE and REMAND.
I
The facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jimmie Lee Riley v. David T. KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Walker v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- McGee v. McDonald Restaurants of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Laube v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
- Hudson v. DennehyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Carruthers v. IsraelDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Hadix v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.