Legal Opinion

Homer Burrus v. American Casualty Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 18, 1975No. 74-1222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff Homer Burrus brought this action for breach of a compromise agreement, which he alleges had been intended to settle a tort action. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the ground that since, upon breach of the compromise agreement, Burrus had prosecuted the original tort action to a final judgment, he was precluded from now bringing a suit based on breach of the compromise agreement. The plaintiff appeals.

I

According to the pleadings, Burrus was injured when struck by an automobile and, as a result,, brought a tort action against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burrus v. SilhavyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cohoon v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McCoy v. McCoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. National Lock Co. v. HoglandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kathey Marchand Stipelcovich, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Deceased Noel F. Stipelcovich v. Sand Dollar Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Hoover v. Hearth & Home Design Center, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Smith v. BrinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Parke v. First National Bank of ElkhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Farmers State Bank of Wyatt v. Clark Equipment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API