Legal Opinion

Kosobucki v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1980No. Appeal, No. 510 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

This is an appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed the referee and denied Charles Kosobucki (Claimant) benefits. The Board held that in the absence of an obvious causal connection between Claimant’s hernia injury and the incident which occurred in the course of his employment, unequivocal medical testimony was necessary before Claimant could prevail. The Board found that the Claimant’s evidence failed to meet this standard and that the referee erred in finding that it did.

*329Claimant is employed as an assistant bottler by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Morgan v. Giant Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. McPhillips v. School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Royesky v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilkes-Barre, City v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Atlas Electrical Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Walsh v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Wool v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API