Legal Opinion

Blau v. Tool Research & Engineering Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 31, 1971No. 71 Civ. 2439PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TYLER, District Judge.

Defendant moves to dismiss this action for attorneys fees for services rendered in connection with a violation of section 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), on the ground of lack of venue or, in the alternative, to transfer this action to the *1375Southerh District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Both motions are denied.

Plaintiffs assert venue is proper either under section 27 of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa1 or under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)2 since in addition to this being one of the “remedial incidents” of securities…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. SuarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jacobs v. TenneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  4. Kane v. Central American Mining & Oil, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  5. Jerome L. Gilson and Morris J. Levy v. Chock Full O'Nuts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bastille Properties, Inc. v. Hometels of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  2. A+ Network, Inc. v. ShapiroDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API