Legal Opinion

Nance v. United Fruit Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1930No. 13,479PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

■ Plaintiff, the widow of a former employee of defendant, seeks to recover compensation fpr his death, claiming that he was killed by an accident arising out of and in the' course of his employment.

The facts, which are in the main admitted, are: That the decedent was a member of the “shore gang” of defendant, which gang at that time was composed of himself and three other laborers and a foreman, a Mr. Whatley; that the “shore gang” had moved a large pump along the wharf to a spot alongside the steamship Cartago, belonging to defendant; that the pump was to be placed upon the Cartago, but was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pierre v. BarringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Piske v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Watson v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill and Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Daigle v. MoodySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Blanchard v. OgimaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Bush v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Smith v. WalkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API