Legal Opinion
Daigle v. Moody
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 31, 1932No. 31910PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
This is a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Acts of Louisiana, and is before us on a writ of review from the Court of Ax>peal, Second Circuit, 140 So. 842, 843.
Alex Daigle was drowned while in the employ of defendant. His mother and a sister, alleging dependency, brought suit to recover compensation for 300 weeks under section 8, Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended by Act No. 85 of 1926. In the alternative, they prayed for damages under article 2315 of the Civil Code. Both the district court and the Court of Appeal correctly held that the employment came under the Workmen’s Compensation Acts,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ferguson v. Cady-McFarland Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Pierre v. BarringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Brown v. Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Conaway v. Marine Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Garcia v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lee v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Sanderson v. Binnings Construction CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Cole v. List & Weatherly Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Majure v. William H. Alsup & AssociatesMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Brown v. Kansas City Bridge Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.