Legal Opinion

Charles P. Kellogg & Co. v. Hazlett

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 14, 1896No. 82PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Dickinson district court; - James Humphrey, judge. Action by Charles P. Kel-' logg & Co. against Edward E. Hazlett, in which a, garnishee summons was issued. Prom a judgment quashing the summons, on motion of the garnishees, the plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garver, J. :

Charles P. Kellogg & Co. commenced this action January 20, 1892, in the district court of •Dickinson county, against Edward E. Hazlett, on a debt not due, and had an order of attachment issued, under section 230 of the civil code. At the same time an affidavit was made and filed for a garnishee summons, on the ground that the defendant had not *526property liable to execution sufficient to satisfy the plaintiff’s demand. No bond, in addition to the undertaking in attachment, was given in the garnishment proceeding, but a garnishee summons was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rullman v. HulseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Pierce v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Ballinger v. LantierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Victor B. Buck & Co. v. J. G. Panabaker & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buzbee v. Allen County State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Swofford Bros. Dry-goods Co. v. John S. Brittain Dry-goods Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
  3. Mortgage Trust Co. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API