Legal Opinion

State v. Fruge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 6, 1967No. 48472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Chief Justice.1

The defendant, charged by indictment with theft,2 was prosecuted, as reflected by the state’s Bill of Particulars, as a principal,3 in that he aided and abetted one Elousie Stegall in committing the offense. In this appeal from his conviction and sentence he relies on all of the bills reserved and perfected during the course of the trial; however, we think that, - taken together, they constitute only two issues, the first being that the act charged in the indictment, as the facts upon which it is based are detailed in the state’s Bill of Particulars, even if entirely…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  3. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  4. State v. MattioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McGrawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. State v. DuplantisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  4. State v. McCurdyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API