State v. Fruge
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Chief Justice.1
The defendant, charged by indictment with theft,2 was prosecuted, as reflected by the state’s Bill of Particulars, as a principal,3 in that he aided and abetted one Elousie Stegall in committing the offense. In this appeal from his conviction and sentence he relies on all of the bills reserved and perfected during the course of the trial; however, we think that, - taken together, they constitute only two issues, the first being that the act charged in the indictment, as the facts upon which it is based are detailed in the state’s Bill of Particulars, even if entirely…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- State v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- State v. MattioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. McGrawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- State v. DuplantisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- State v. McCurdyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970