Legal Opinion
United States v. Riccio
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 17, 2008No. 07-2604PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BESOSA, District Judge.
Appellant John L. Riccio was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1001 by submitting a false statement on a background check form (SF-86) to his former employer, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). On appeal, Mr. Riccio argues (1) that the district court abused its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial based on the government’s “prosecutorial misstatements” during the trial; (2) that the Court erred in instructing the jury on the intent element of § 1001; (3) that the Court erred in considering, at sentencing, Mr. Riccio’s sworn and counseled…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. YermianSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Larry PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. SilvaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. John NataleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.