Remy v. Exley Produce Express, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant and cross-defendant Pacific Finance Corporation appeals from a judgment, after jury verdict, in favor of cross-complainant Exley Produce Express, Inc.
Questions Presented
1. The main question presented is whether the verdict and judgment are inconsistent with a simultaneous verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff and against both Pacific Finance and Exley.
2. Has defendant waived his right to claim inconsistency?
3. Should the judgment in favor of plaintiff be reversed?
Record
The action arises out of a collision between a truck and trailer belonging to plaintiff and a truck and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Blache v. BlacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Inyo Chemical Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Henrioulle v. Marin Ventures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Godfrey v. SteinpressCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Lambert v. General MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Morris v. McCauley's Quality Transmission ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MascottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.