Legal Opinion
Ball v. Breed
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 5, 1923No. 29PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
On motion of' defendant, the District Court dismissed the complaint. There was no other pleading and no testi- • mony. The complaint was verified May 4, 1922, and the motion to dismiss was dated and served on September 14, 1922. On September 29, 1922, the District Court filed its memorandum, opinion, stating the grounds of dismissal. Plaintiff served a notice of motion dated November 10, 1922, for leave to amend the complaint.
In support of this motion the solicitor for plaintiff filed his affidavit stating that the facts set forth in the proposed amendments were not fully…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Tilton v. CofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Davis v. Las Ovas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Yeiser v. United States Board & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- South Penn Collieries Co. v. SproulCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- Arn v. DunnettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Arn v. Operators Royalty & Producing Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1936
- Bosc v. 39 Broadway, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Ball v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.