Legal Opinion

Kinan v. City of Brockton

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 3, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 83-3834-McPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OF DEFENDANT, CITY OF BROCKTON (# 138)

ROBERT B. COLLINGS, United States Magistrate.

The defendant, City of Brockton, (hereinafter, “the defendant”) noticed the depositions of the plaintiff and three other witnesses. Pursuant to Rule 30(c), F.R.Civ.P., the defendant requested that the officer taking the depositions transcribe them. The plaintiff ordered a copy of the first day of his own deposition but did not order copies of the second day of his deposition or any of the three other depositions.

Evidently, the parties…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C.P.C. Partnership Bardot Plastics, Inc. v. P.T.R., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schroer v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
  2. Cochran v. Northeastern Vermont RegionalVermont Superior Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API