Legal Opinion

Schroer v. United States

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided May 9, 2008No. Civil Action No. 07-cv-00690-LTB-BNBPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BOYD N. BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before me on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Docu*532ments and Related Relief [Doc. # 59, filed 4/21/2008] (the “Motion”). The plaintiff seeks an order compelling the defendant to produce to the plaintiff, pursuant to a production request made under Rule 34, Fed. R.Civ.P., “[c]opies of all transcripts of depositions conducted in [this] action.” Motion at p. 1. The plaintiff also seeks an extension of the expert witness deadline. The Motion is DENIED.

I

The plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint seeking “a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Colorado Visionary Academy v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
  3. Dilmar Oil Co., Inc. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
  4. Thompson v. HoitsmaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
  5. C.P.C. Partnership Bardot Plastics, Inc. v. P.T.R., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adams v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Adams v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Ali Musaid Ahmed Muthana v. Elizabeth PopielDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Brooks v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  5. Capana Swiss Advisors AG v. Rymark Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API