Legal Opinion

Hydanus v. McMahan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The objectors proved by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence that the will of Katherine Culver was the result of undue influence. The objectors proved the presence of the four elements referred to in Will of Fretiag (1960), 9 Wis. (2d) 315, 317, 101 N. W. (2d) 108. In addition, we believe that the finding of the trial court that Mrs. Culver was under insane delusions at the time she executed her will is not against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Accordingly, it follows that the order of the county court sustaining the objections and denying probate of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gerber v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gmeiner v. YacteIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Smith v. Smith (In Re Estate of Smith)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Estate of McGonigalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re Estate of KamesarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re Estate of TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API