Hutto v. State

McCLUNG, Justice.

Ronnie Eugene Hutto appeals his conviction for possession of, with intent to promote, obscene devices. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Hutto first argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because there was no evidence that he had actual possession of the devices. The information charged Hutto with possessing *408obscene devices, three vibrators, with the intent to promote them. When addressing an insufficiency of the evidence claim, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could…