Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. C. H. Atkinson Paving Co. v. Aronson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 21, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prohibition. C.H. Atkinson Paving Company, a foreign corporation, relator here, having its only place of business in Missouri in Livingston County and there served with process, questions the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis over its person in a cause therein pending entitled Eugene Schmidt et al. v. The City of St. Louis, a municipal corporation, C.H. Atkinson Paving Company et al. In said action plaintiffs seek $60,000 damages alleged to have been occasioned their real estate by reason of a change in the grade of an abutting street. Relator, appearing specially,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Werth v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Stewart v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. State Ex Rel. National Refining Co. v. SeehornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Thomson v. Mayor of BoonvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. Hunt v. City of BoonvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boll v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Willey v. Fyrogas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Rakestraw v. NorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Baker v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. State Ex Rel. McCubbin v. McMillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API