Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1991No. B055374PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

In this mandamus proceeding, we are asked to decide generally if a defendant who is subject to a mandatory minimum county jail sentence for a driving under the influence conviction may be eligible to participate in an electronic home detention program authorized by Penal Code section 1203.016. Specifically, the People seek a peremptory writ to vacate a sentencing order placing the defendant real party in interest on probation and ordering the probation department “to arrange forthwith for Defendant to be placed on the home monitoring program.” We conclude that such a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Marriage of DoverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. FlowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Peterson)California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Opinion No. (1999), California Attorney General Reports1999
  3. People v. BillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1994
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API