Legal Opinion
Spinetti v. Service Corp. International
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 15, 2001No. CIV.A.01-1191PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER OF COURT
AMBROSE, District Judge.
SYNOPSIS
Following her termination from employment. Plaintiff commenced suit against her former employers, arguing that she was fired because of age and gender discrimination. Accordingly, she asserted claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and under Title VII of the CM Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). The Employer believes that Spinetti is contractually obligated to resolve these claims through an arbitration process, and has filed a Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration (Docket…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maryann Spinetti v. Service Corporation International and Service Corporation International of Pennsylvania D/B/A Lafayette Memorial ParkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Parilla v. IAP Worldwide Services VI, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Plaskett v. Bechtel International, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
- Spenceley Office Equipment v. Ricoh Latin America, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2007
- Virgen Parilla v. Iap Worldwide Services Vi, Inc. Worldwide Services, Inc. Gene Ludlow Roy Varner Parilla v. Iap Worldwide Services Vi, Inc. Iap Worldwide Services, Inc. Gene Ludlow Roy VarnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004