Legal Opinion

Ceres Partners v. GEL Associates

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 8, 1990No. 390, Docket 89-7666PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Ceres Partners (“Ceres”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Milton Pollack, Judge, summarily dismissing its complaint for damages against defendants GEL Associates (“GEL”), et al., for violation of §§ 10(b), 14(d), and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Williams Act, Pub.L. No. 90-439, § 3, 82 Stat. 455 (1968) (collectively “1934 Act” or “Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78n(d), and 78n(e) (1988), and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Dodds v. Cigna Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., and Fujisawa Usa, Inc. v. John K. KapoorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Welch III v. Cadre CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Banque Arabe Et Internationale D'Investissement v. Maryland National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API