Legal Opinion

Medusa Portland Cement Co. v. Pearl Assur. Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 23, 1945No. 22615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint sets up a-claim for $70,523 on an insurance policy issued to plaintiff by Pearl Assurance Company, Ltd., for a three year term beginning November 1, 1942. The loss resulted-from* an .explosion in an economizer in the *333plaintiff’s plant at Silica, Ohio, on January 25, 1944.

Defendant has filed three motions attacking the amended complaint: (1) amotion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 12(b) (6), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; (2) an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
  2. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walling v. Wyandotte Furniture Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1946
  2. Allen V. Smith, Inc. v. Philadelphia Brewing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API