Deakin v. Scheuer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
In its decision the civil court found that the plaintiff, in procuring the exchange of the properties referred tO', acted in a dual capacity without having first made a full disclosure to both of the parties engaged in the exchange, and that such failure to make full disclosure, upon the grounds of public policy, debarred him of his right to a commission.
The doctrine is well settled that a party engaging the services of an agent is entitled to the exclusive and undivided efforts of the latter in his behalf; that where an agent, unknown to his principal, upon an agreement for a commission,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Sullivan v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Herman v. MartineauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
- Meyer v. HanchettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Siegel v. GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rosenberg v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Wolfe v. International Reinsurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934