Legal Opinion

Middlebrooks v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1929No. 19013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where in a suit by the holder of a joint and several promissory note against three persons as makers, two of the makers pleaded and proved that the holder had accepted from the third maker a sum of money “in full settlement of his liability personally” on the note, as evidenced by a written agreement between them, it was error to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintilf and against the defendants who interposed this defense. The release of one of the persons so jointly liable operated, prima facie, as a release of the others, and the obligation was apparently no longer enforceable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. McLendon Bros. v. FinchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Griffin Hosiery Mills v. United Hosiery MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Clark v. MalloryIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hale v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. OuztsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Georgia Department of Revenue v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Burgess v. Ohio National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Georgia Department of Revenue v. Richard MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API