Legal Opinion

Austin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1981No. 80-438PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

This case presents one principal question: whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress evidence seized at the time of his arrest from an automobile and from a briefcase found there. We conclude that appellant neither had “automatic standing” to challenge the search and seizure nor showed any legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched or the property seized. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions.

I

On June 28,1978, a Superior Court grand jury indicted appellant, John A. Austin, on various counts arising out of certain…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API