Legal Opinion

Fritschler v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNeuson, J.

The facts are not in dispute. On April 12, 1930, plaintiff’s husband, Gust Fritschler, was employed by Joe Kopschinski, who was doing construction work for the Tomahawk Kraft Paper Company. The contract work was that of constructing a brick wall inclosing a building already in existence. Fritschler and several other employees of Kopschinski were working on a scaffold platform which extended out seven feet from the brick wall being constructed. A high-tension wire carrying 44,000 volts ran along the building parallel with it at a distance of sixteen feet therefrom. While Fritschler and several…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Karges v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Cream City Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API