Legal Opinion

In Re Victor

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1934No. Docket No. Crim. 3728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The petitioner was found guilty by the railroad commission of a violation of an order of the commission and was ordered punished by a' fine of five hundred dollars and by five days imprisonment in the county jail of Los Angeles County. It was further ordered that in case of default in payment of the fine the petitioner be committed to said county jail until the fine be paid or satisfied in the proportion of one day’s imprisonment for each five dollars of the fine. The order became final. The petitioner served the five days in jail and was thereupon released from custody. Thereafter, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In Re MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Ex parte AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. In Re JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Loustalot v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Lay v. District Court, Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re CiraoloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. In Re GalikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API