Watters v. DeMilio
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Jones,
This appeal arises out of an action of assumpsit on a promissory note given by the defendant to the plaintiff’s assignor. The case was tried to the court below without a jury. The court made extensive findings of fact and rendered a verdict for the plaintiff for the face amount of the note which, by its terms, was non-interest bearing. Exceptions by the defendant to the adjudication were dismissed and the judgment from which the defendant has appealed was entered on the verdict.
The note in suit was executed and delivered in the following circumstances. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daniels v. NotorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Flexlume Corp. v. NorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Myersdale & Salisbury Street Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania & Maryland Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Strauss & Co. v. BermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Gillis v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hillbrook Apartments, Inc. v. Nyce Crete Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hazer v. ZabalaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re RothmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Schwab v. McDonald (In Re LMcD, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- WF Meyers Co., Inc. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.