Legal Opinion
Bloomer Bros. v. Smith
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtG. Robert Witmer, J.
On this motion by Bloomer Bros. Company to vacate a notice of arbitration, and cross motion by Local No. 544, United Papermakers and Paperworkers of America, AFL-CIO (hereinafter referred to as Union) to compel arbitration, it appears that there exists a labor contract between the parties, the Union being the bargaining agent for all of the company’s employees covered thereby. The company has temporarily transferred one Philip Cornelia from a position as machine tender, admittedly within the bargaining unit under the terms of the contract, to a position as tour boss, which places him in a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between Dalcro Corp. & International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1961