Legal Opinion

Christian Brothers, Inc. v. South Windsor Arena, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 10, 1986No. 4274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The named defendant (South Windsor) and the defendants, the Arena Operating Company, Inc. (Arena), and Richard Grigorian, appeal from the judgment the trial court rendered against them in accordance with the report issued by the attorney referee before whom the case was tried. The defendants claim that the court erred in denying their objections to the report, and in rendering judgment in accordance with it, because the report contained an erroneous conclusion of law: that South Windsor’s separate corporate identity could be ignored and Grigorian and South Windsor could be held liable for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Zaist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Hoffman Wall Paper Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Milgrim v. DelucaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Falcone v. Night Watchman, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  2. Tomsky v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API