Legal Opinion

State v. Cockerham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1999No. 80,259PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

The State appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to correct an illegal sentence. This court’s jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(3) for an appeal by the prosecution upon a question reserved. The narrow question reserved is whether the trial court’s grant of credit to the defendant for prison time served in Kentucky against his earlier Kansas sentence was a modification of his sentence without jurisdiction and, therefore, an illegal sentence.

The facts in this case are undisputed. The defendant, Larry E.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. City of Overland Park v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. State v. Van WinkleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LaPointeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Winstead v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. StorerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  5. State v. LaPointeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API