Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 30, 1997No. 76,557PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

The State of Kansas appeals upon a question reserved, pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(3). The State disputes the district court’s finding that when one conviction, previously consolidated for trial with convictions from other complaints, is used as an element in a subsequent crime, the other previously consolidated convictions cannot be used in determining the defendant’s criminal history.

On October 10, 1995, defendant Ernest L. Taylor pled guilty to nine counts in three complaints which had been consolidated for trial: (1) in case No. 95 CR…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. RoderickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. State v. BooneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. State v. VandervortSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. State v. VontressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. State v. Vega-FuentesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API