Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Marshall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting the provision thereof, in effect, declaring that two Chase Manhattan Bank accounts, with account numbers ending in 39-01 and 18-01, respectively, and held by the plaintiff former husband in trust for his mother, were not marital assets subject to distribution, and substituting therefor a provision declaring that those bank accounts are marital assets and that each party shall receive 50% of the funds held in those accounts; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steinberg v. SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Embury v. EmburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Farag v. FaragAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- D'Angelo v. D'AngeloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Saasto v. SaastoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sotnik v. ZavilyanskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lauzonis v. LauzonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Lauzonis v. LauzonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Marshall v. MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Sotnik v. ZavilyanskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012