Legal Opinion

General Ribbon Mills, Inc. v. Higgins

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 16, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

The defendant, Collector of Internal Revenue, moves for summary judgment, Rule 56(b), Federal Rules Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, upon the complaint and answer and an agreed statement of facts to which are attached four exhibits. Plaintiff has made a cross motion for summary judgment under subdivision (a) of the rule.

Plaintiff corporation was assessed $1,-868.90 as a capital stock tax, on the ground that it was “carrying on or doing business” for part of the year ending June 30, 1937. Section 105 of the Revenue Act of 1935, as amended by Section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. Nunnally Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  2. Argonaut Consolidated Mining Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. Peabody Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. Eaton v. Phoenix Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. New Haven Securities Co. v. BitgoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Ribbon Mills, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API