Legal Opinion
Chambers v. St. Mary's School
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1998No. 1997-1967PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 563.] CHAMBERS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ST. MARY’S SCHOOL, APPELLEE. [Cite as Chambers v. St. Mary’s School,
1998-Ohio-184.] Torts—Negligence—Violation of an administrative rule does not constitute negligence per se; however, violation may be admissible as evidence of negligence. The violation of an administrative rule does not constitute negligence per se; however, such a violation may be admissible as evidence of negligence. (No. 97-1967—Submitted May 27, 1998—Decided August 12, 1998.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chambers v. St. Mary's SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Aycock v. Sandy Valley Church of God, 2006 Ap 09 0054 (1-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, 06 Ca 18 (5-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Middleton v. HolbrookOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Webster v. ShawOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Arndt v. P M Ltd., 2007-P-0038 (5-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.