Legal Opinion
Curry v. Maxson
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 23, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 17592-3PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF DIVERSITY JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 1332, TITLE 28, U.S.C.
BECKER, District Judge.
In the complaint herein, plaintiff alleges that he was negligently treated for acne by the defendant with the result that his face was scarred and permanently disfigured. Plaintiff demands $65,-000 in damages. Plaintiff asserts federal jurisdiction under the diversity statute, Section 1332, Title 28, United States Code.
Standard Pretrial Order No. 2 was filed herein on June 5, 1970. One of the issues of fact therein set out to be resolved was whether diversity of citizenship…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Interior Construction & Improvement Co. v. GibneySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Ziady v. CurleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- De Wit v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Bopp v. BoppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Specking v. SpeckingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fahrner v. GentzschDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Rodriguez Diaz v. Sierra MartinezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.