Legal Opinion

Nabaya v. Aber

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-0440Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHAPAT NABAYA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-440 (TJK) JESSICA D. ABER et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Shapat Nabaya, proceeding pro se, has filed the instant Bivens action, naming as defendants the following individuals: (1) Assistant U.S. Attorneys (“AUSAs”) Jessica Aber and Gabrielle Michalak, U.S. District Court Judge Hannah Lauck, U.S. Magistrate Judge David Novak, and U.S. Probation Officer Tanya L. Smith (collectively, the “Federal Defendants”); and (2) Federal Public Defenders Joseph Camden and Mary Maguire…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Kent B. Crane v. New York Zoological SocietyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API