Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Homes for the Homeless, Inc. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 2005Published

1Concurrence

Andrias and McGuire, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part in a memorandum by McGuire, J., as follows:

Although I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the order should be reversed, I would confirm the determination of appellant Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York (the BSA), and dismiss the petition.

Homes for the Homeless, Inc. (HFH), operates a transitional housing facility for homeless families in Queens known as “the Saratoga” (the facility). The facility is comprised of two former hotel buildings, which were abandoned by their prior owners *345following the hotels’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Ifrah v. UtschigNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Pecoraro v. Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. MATTER OF PLEASANT VALLEY HOME CONSTR., LTD. v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. SoHo Alliance v. New York City Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API