Legal Opinion
Hall v. FRUEHAUF CORPORATION
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 16, 1986No. 71598PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Fruehauf Corporation repaired Hall’s trailer on August 3, 1982, in Apopka, Florida. In October it broke down in Dallas, Texas, and was hauled to Atlanta, where it was repaired by Fruehauf at no expense to Hall. The repairs took six weeks to complete. When the truck was taken for repairs in Florida, Hall signed a work order which stated that the order was subject to the terms and conditions on the back. The back of the work order contains a warranty of parts and/or repairs for ninety days and states that defects in materials or workmanship will be replaced or repaired…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- R. L. Kimsey Cotton Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Cash v. Street & Trail, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Stefan Jewelers, Inc. v. Electro-Protective Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Wilcher v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lee Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Dale v. Comcast Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Abdulla v. KlosinskiDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012
- William J. Cooney, P.C. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- James Darren Summerville v. Innovative Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.